West specimen 080,410 slaves: Ge Hongbing, male beauty writer-style the.
but the thought also just shows that the Chinese knowledge of the , knowledge of some art, that takes all in various fields, and then inexplicably sent a lot of comments, arrogance and ignorance.
why the
The reason is simple, basic ideas in their copy, imitation of Western thought, their brains have become a cultural comprador of the brain, where the day is how to integrate into the > Since the backbone of the local culture is not, knelt down, down, under the control of nature is not surprising.
special sense of humor, three years in China, the so-called br> But at least all of the West, slaves, all from that thinking, the pursuit of universal values of the party standing on behalf of justice.
fact, they lean on nothing more than a rod or a strong refuge in the United States,
This is called wind down the fence.
philosophy, literature, journalism especially, social sciences and economics but also as a prime example.
> There were only a few or very few of excellence, they can really make a glorious years of independent, thoughtful, idea guru,
thinking when is the real gem.
but many people can only pick up doomed , follow the prisoners, the comprador culture, trying to completely destroy the local culture to become the fifth column;
also very fortunate that this chaos is a great litmus test time, it brutal, direct, long-term test of the fair to give everyone a huge stage for extraordinary, magnificent.
decades into the era of the heroic age, to become gangsters of the believers were thrown, a few times a new pattern of the master shape.
this regard, I admired teacher Qian Liqun, Yu Jie from his criticism, and China as the country faced a series of questions above, are deeply rooted in this land of its top.
its accumulated knowledge of Western thought, drawing on the part of the rather than pay homage to the masters, or to discuss foreign adults like stepping stone.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
GE Hong commented Event 99 FRY:
defensive logic. the war party, which uses the other's conscience: it knows it is the enemy of conscience, do not want to harm innocent civilians, the civilians suffered even fooled into enemies, it will not open to the civilian population gun. so it will catch up with their own people the bridge, it is the people with their cruel, bloodthirsty, no value to verify its opponents to its people cherish, it's cruel to experiment with their opponent's conscience. will harm innocent people. and ten million dollars a hundred dollars a difference is the territory of other countries in order to hurt a little less on the innocent people of other countries. a real conscience. > Ge Hongbing, 1968, a representative of the new generation of contemporary Chinese scholars, writers. Doctor of Literature (1998), Professor (2001), Master Instructor (1999), doctoral tutor (2003). Singapore's Nanyang Technological University researchers, senior visiting scholar at Cambridge University, Guizhou Normal University Visiting Professor of Contemporary Literature Research Association of China, Research Association of Chinese literary theory.
Ge Hongbing under the tutelage of Professor since 1987 has had Huapeng, such as in China, Mr. Xu Zhiying contemporary literature, literary studies, published more than ten kinds of monographs, and another multi-volume Modern and Contemporary Literature and Culture and Contemporary Art Review, published monograph, General Introduction Guide the N types of life The dissection and critical consciousness moralists say that I hate. This most hypocritical. I have seen a few moralists, they are usually very good for a girl, they all week the girls get together almost weekly tea. However, when The little girl appeared problems in life, need them to come out to say hello, some explanation, they refused and away one by one all of them are run without a trace. This is the moralists. they are to keep Taoism his face, will be at the expense of others, even the least to know what these people are friends regardless of friendship, where they have trusted it. most of the moralists is to belittle and attack others to prove their moral. They They are considered a high moral character of the moralists, most of the time not because of what they have high positive move, but because they often criticized the so-called immoral behavior and immoral elements, they condemned others to get a reputation Thus the more often the Keku others, when necessary, they are not afraid of others rubbed the salt in the wound.
However, some read a lot of so-called intellectuals do not seem to understand this principle. a friend told I talk about the film Because once the capital of China is very sacred, so the film I asked him, are the When the flag is illegal, to stand up against the Americans. one can respect a voluntary thing, but not forced to respect a thing. In the friend view, the laity to saints when the Buddha is valid reason for the laity not have the right to take the quiet of a silent saint. So, that fat guy movie of the book are only selling books in his bookstore, never should have his fantasy, as fantasy what is even more outrageous Patton the.
fact, under normal circumstances are very easy-going saint, and saints are not taboo to take their own sense of humor about. For example, Mao Zedong, he met with foreign guests would use Humor for a return to old age. It is said that the people present will an understanding smile, laugh at someone is not heard President, on the contrary we feel from the President of the humor in the personality component. Such examples do not give medals won, is not a taboo to take yourself back humor, fear of fear in some of us who consider themselves gave the saints, and then do not head their own tail. He handed over to the saints of their rights, which even includes the right to laugh. Now, we finally caught up with a good time, laugh, but some people are on the the saints, such as Button) the name of virtue is that some intellectuals. they are afraid of the laughter of the public, they want the public to like them all day long frown. This is China's elite. They will put the spirit of the low mass, the claim to the public instructors, which kinds of attitudes and so-called Enlightenment of the 20th century obscurantism 50 to 70 years in the face of political attitudes appears to the contrary, in fact the same, the era of political ignorance is called the public do not think the market is called the elite of the times the public not to laugh . Anyway, in addition to the general public should suffer, in the practice of asceticism in their moral, ideal for a great fight outside, it should not have any other ideas. with such attitude towards the public it should not be an intellectual to be hold the position. a politician, a military strategist he does so, he will achieve political public life as a tool for revenge and military objectives may also be understandable, but an intellectual, he was at any time, should not, under any conditions case. However, precisely at this point the lack of Chinese intellectuals is the most humane care.
invented / was supposed to protect the human body / / and human body today, even with his / component shield / protect the rest of the river bridge on the only / / that is already adjacent to the next century / justice and conscience / a Road to go / /
poet I feel shame.
a poet, an intellectual, he should be singing for human lives, he should be recognized that the purpose of life is life itself, but now, He sings a human shield.
not think he wants to, it will be the value of the body below the bridge as the body must pay the price for the existence of the bridge, not the reverse. He forgot a common-sense logic, the existence of the bridge is to allow the body relaxed, do not have to cross a river and a detour or a swim, he did not know you can rely on the human body to destroy a bridge built, and destroyed the body, but not by bridges to rebuild, he just know, the bridge is necessary for human existence, and therefore its value was higher than the human body. This is ridiculous logic.
a country (as a rule form) does not care about the people of this country the right to life , but to encourage people to use their bodies to protect the property, which his own people as a tool and not an end, it allows people to get their enchant a bridge body, a cannon or a car hh, its legal existence I think very doubtful nature. It is not the life of their own people as the world's most valuable, but on the contrary, things will be in this country as their own purpose, it would prefer a physical, not willing to be a person, it makes for things to exist, its what the people of this country mean? a country only its efforts to protect people's lives and more freedom to make people's lives better when it has reason to exist.
I know that justice and conscience are often under the cover and test the authenticity of this cover is the attitude to human life. We can see that one side of life carefully, they used ten million dollars a bomb, Why they do not have a hundred dollars a bomb? because that is not long-range precision-guided bombs would harm innocent people. and ten million dollars a hundred dollars a difference is the territory of other countries in order to hurt a little on the small innocent people in other countries. And the other? They treat their own citizens? their own citizens to form human shields, they use TV, use the radio to encourage this practice to promote this practice, they allow people to do their own shield and did not feel pity and shame, which is way they treat their own people's
. I want to know why the country like it exists in the end, what it is in the protection, protection for whom?
Perhaps many of us will said it was the people themselves are willing. I do not know, something thousands of people can bring together so efficiently, they were driven, are organized. there is no organizer of planning, it is difficult to imagine the number of thousands of people to act in unison, not to mention they are civilians, not soldiers trained it? Who is behind the wheel with the class to organize their own body guard the bridge?
even if the justice had no right to act as such an organization , even if there is no reason to use the conscience of thousands of lives at risk, but just to a bridge.
human shields, which is what a shameless defense logic. the war party, which uses the other conscience: it knows it is the enemy of conscience, do not want to harm innocent civilians, even those of civilians affected by the fool become enemies, do not shoot the civilians. so it will catch up with their own people bridge It's the people with their cruel, bloodthirsty, no value to verify its opponents to its people cherish, it's cruel to experiment with their own conscience of the opponent.
Yes, it finally succeeds, it The success of human shields, and finally down the bridge to be protected.
But I say, this is not a successful strategy of human shields, but that is seen as the conscience of the success of the enemy, from which I see the a true conscience conscience mm.
day dreams, I see a father like that, he and others in a duel, and suddenly he was going to fail. this time, he turned back to the house, a pulling out of his own son, the sharp blade mounted on the neck of his son, his son standing in front of him, do his own shield, and he said to his opponent: you shoot it, you kill but I will not be my son.
to this when I woke up in a cold sweat, I forget his opponent if fired. but I was thinking, this father, who is eligible to be a father? I definitely do not want to be a father like son.
which I think, a writer, a writer should be some basic conscience that? or a writer, whether he should have a basic conscience? this I often feel disappointed They live by some paste paste his head, they only know to follow suit, just know others, and they lost the ability to think, lost his as a person's basic sense.
only know with a utilitarian logic, do not know the logic of employing Road, to consider the issue of who had no right to speak wore the guise of writer, he should do and not a poet, politician, intellectual, intellectuals, the only logic is at all. even for the so-called higher than the individual lives), these special historical circumstances, in the utilitarian logic, the political consideration is reasonable, but a writer, it is always unreasonable, it is considered a writer's touchstone. < br> is standing on the position, not to speak at the position of objects is an intellectual mm the only sign that it should be the only moral code of intellectuals.
see that scholars, when they walk way from rickets waist, as if the weight of the knowledge that they have been overburdened, they were talking, always citing, as if the references in addition to others, they themselves no words to say, the time of their lives in the interpretation of mm in the words of others paper, is true in life. scholarship, for them is to see how others say, from this book to that book, if they remove the article in the citation, the article left their down to only the quotes. their eyes developed, not only with the naked eye of ordinary people, plus two lenses, their eyes appear to be born is reading, reading how the sages say, and then follow that, so They became full of moralists, they get on a common disease called They also used this approach in life, if life for them, not their own thing, but the book provides a good thing early on, their knowledge killed them, and they live in this world is to practice of the saints in the book have provided good predictions, life predictions for each step is the realization of the saints. They have lost their living, that real people died. they are afraid of something outside of any book, no saints did not say things, they fear, a little something new (such as a new brand of ice cream) will make their full text of skull short, so they do except stay home all day outside the so-called learned not to do anything else. they do not dare go out on the street make them dizzy modern girl, modern girl miniskirt hit their forehead moralism, so that they issue a moralism exclaimed. they are changing the living The world is fear, and they did not dare touch the world, so they are confined with a reason to own up, for this reason we often hear mm scholars to sitting on the bench. They were too weak, weak to the neon light will make them sick. so they can sit on the bench at home.
This is a reflection of the knowledge in them. They use knowledge instead of thinking of knowledge as we have for them no doubt like brushing your teeth every day . they live in the knowledge feel extremely safe. Shoubushijuan they left the books they to do? they can not do anything.
Chinese intellectuals disease where the most serious moral. their moral too much, They tried to establish the moral order of society, they are willing to serve as the moral role of the referee. A top-heavy physically very weak, he
Why in the world based on how he prove necessary for the world ? He said: My shape is decadent, my body was weak, my body is virtual, but my soul is strong, my soul is noble, My God is brave; he said: there is one person in the world is important that the soul Clofibrate and clean, the body is shameful and despicable dirty crude, only the great and noble soul is pure and happy. mm literati is used in this way the dichotomy of body and soul proved his superior, proved the value of their own existence, thereby lifting the value of their own anxiety, this anxiety to those who passed on the labor.
is that these scholars to kill the original homes in the spirit of this world unified body of flesh, regardless of the true state of the person to be at the Clofibrate, the establishment of two monsters: the soul of man, the flesh, and came up with two imaginary monster weaving countless myths. literati wrote: Morality is knowledge. literati by the knowledge that he is eating, he said that only knowledge can lead to moral, again revealing the meaning is the only author (with knowledge of the people) are the real people who have morals. which leads me to think of a worker mm a farmer, he would not be the same as a civilian side of the field work (such as spraying pesticides), while that their labor is the only moral, he would not say that only the spraying of pesticides will lead to moral. and that all people are like He, like labor (spraying pesticides). a farmer, a farmer that he will not be so simple, he just quietly work, his ethics is his body, his strength, and the results of his physical strength to those bright green bright green mm of green vegetables, carrots, red tomatoes are red, apples, vegetable market when he came, he sat in his vegetable Gongyao Tanqian, he is not talking, do not need rhetoric, he is the best language of vegetables, he moral Gongyao in his silent sitting of the body, in his vegetables fresh and confident. His silence in the body of morality is to stay in results, not the language of the soul, the invisible , and the rhetoric of the unreal. scholar, said: ;. mm authors further stated that the soul of this society is that they, the public body but this society. m in the heart of the identity of people here to implement the real-world dichotomy in the main positions of the people (beyond the subject and general subjects) the absolute level system. literati wrote: moral that order. Confucius say for justice, Nietzsche did not experience the kind of moral philosophy of non-impact, so China's anti-body, hostile perceptual (sensory), depending on the flesh is hostile bandits concept of moral doctrine has continued for thousands of years, Chinese people for thousands of years-long process continue to face these shameful moralist fooled and cheated, and even the Chinese seem to be inherently anti-body. The Chinese people do not attach importance to physical exercise, lack of interest in outdoor sports activities mm contempt of the body too long, a few access to the results of the millennium, a decadent race on the form of the body, moral doctrine should generally weak for this kind of physical fitness, physical strength of the general malaise, sensory (perceptual) is responsible for the decline in general, how a soul is not nationalists it will have this disease?
we recognize the essence of humanitarian individual who is self-selection and the decision affirmed the power, then we will clearly find that the literary moralist how the actions are against humanity doctrine, their purpose is to eliminate the individual: freedom of self-conscious individual, and replace those who have no personality no determination of the rational and universal consciousness. Further, is to sacrifice countless human personality, so that they can not be personal, but a moralist of the moral container, do not create ideological thinking, even thought the power of choice at all. For What a world it would be picture? the world's top boat is moralist, oars, for it carries over to where they have no say. They are no longer in addition to any power other than rowing.
faced moralist I always said to myself: Do not blind faith, we must maintain their own decision. moralist must recognize the face of hypocrisy. In order to more clearly illustrate this point, we simplify this to only three of the world, which is a simplified model of the world. Assuming the three of them only a loaf of bread for food, then moralist would have two other people, said: moralist, I listened to your teachings, for moral perfection, I will dedicate your bread. increasingly sharp rhetoric brilliant, and that people have given their hungry eyes of bread are bad, even to say a non-ideological and non-personal non-determination of people, once we lifted the moralist of the superstition, people no longer believe about God, saints, the corpus of rhetoric, not the absolute belief in the subject, then I believe a super-Ling in the individual on the ethics as a moral absolute belief in universally valid will follow the collapse. people will go home from here, back to that person's position. In other words, there is no universal moral law necessarily, moral doctrine absolutely no right to act as the principal who has no right to dictate to the public.
a moral doctrine, however, he does not dictate the general public, he can do? those moralists, at all times, with the moral doctrine eyes to look at you, once the sign of trouble, in order to maintain the reputation of his moralism to his knowledge he will not hesitate to betray you. They are not only the skull and the body of the monster, and their equipment, without exception, skull full of Those who read the book dead, only talk to those who died. I'd rather those people who have no knowledge of contact: their mind no paste, no saints in the old rules, so they act on their own judgments, even the instinct . their bodies retain the vitality of fresh cherries, they not only think about the world with brains, but also with their own body to think about the world, used in the world body's actions to prove their own thinking. They have no knowledge, but has more than more valuable knowledge instinct, they know full well-being hungry, know how to maintain their existence, unlike those who flaunt their so-called scholars as pole. They know that a person must exist in this world of desire: existence is a desire, in order to spare them there, do not mean to use their bodies, on the contrary they are proud of their bodies, they follow their own instinct in the night and his wife make love, they used their bodies to express their gratitude and love of a lover rather than the language of exaggeration boring. they desire fertility, as proud of their fertility, they do not like those ; have knowledge an intellectual is meaningless.
so I have to oppose the knowledge to survive in one of the true and known to the world of knowledge between a haughty I choose the former, I would like my side is full of friends . they are fat, the soft and alive, did not because , you can often hear their laughter from the bottom of unbridled instinct hh
the moralist, I was born to fear. in front of their sophistry and tactics I often feel very weak. They too will be using the mass of the They use the Olympus flash and sword, the number of Spirits of heroes lost in their laughter, their affinity with people, they have power. was the injured are isolated, they were nailed to shame, I often can see their eyes from the Yang ghosts behind the back from the cross of Christ flashed out, chilling.
You see, they are now in the slander me, they have canceled my morally, just because I can not agree with their ethics, their I did not say moral. So, dear moralistic intellectuals, I ask you, who you have to confront me? your love for this country is more enthusiastic than I do? you for the tears flow in this country more than I do? your lofty academic ideals more than I do? your academic ethics more noble than I do? taking your moral leave me, let me be a moral person without it! Keep your moral take away the moral of my stay, let me in your dictionary to be a rogue, because in my own dictionary, which is a synonym for hero.
No comments:
Post a Comment